linux-kernel - Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200803190512.58703.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:12:57 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed

On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Actually there's a huge #ifndef CONFIG_S390 in linux/irq.h ;)
> 
> To make the code work the patch below is necessary. It's ok since all
> clock event devices on s390 are per cpu. However I think this patch is
> ugly at best. Any ideas how to fix this in a better and more generic way?

You could have an #else path in linux/irq.h to just define these
functions as s390, maybe like

static inline int irq_set_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t cpumask)
{
	BUG();
	return 0;
}
static inline int irq_can_set_affinity(unsigned int irq)
{
	return 0;
}

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/