linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][v4] Modify loop device to be able to manage partitions of the disk image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080319144348.c235508c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:43:48 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
Cc:	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4]  Modify loop device to be able to manage partitions
 of the disk image

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:39:10 +0100
Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net> wrote:

> > > > What happened to the update to Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > that was in v3?
> > > 
> > > Well, perhaps I didn't understand the comment of Andrew:
> > > 
> > > "This shouldn't be needed."
> > > 
> > > I though it means I should remove it. So, Andrew ???
> > 
> > No, given that all module_param() options are available via the boot
> > command line when the module is linked into vmlinux, we don't document them
> > separately.
> 
> "No" is "To document max_part is not needed"
> 
> or
> 
> "No" is "you must not remove parameter documentation from your patch" ?

The former ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/