[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0803191736550.2504-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:46:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lenb@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: + pm-convert-wakeup-flag-accessors-to-inline-functions-fix.patch
added to -mm tree
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:48:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'll drop everything, let's start again.
> >
> > Only how? umm, please review Greg's driver tree, let us know which patches
> > shoudl be dropped from that then send new ones, I guess.
>
> Yes, please do, I'm confused as well :)
Okay. No doubt Rafael will correct me if I get something wrong.
Greg's tree still contains the original, wrong version of
pm-make-wakeup-flags-available-whenever-config_pm-is-set.patch. It
should be reverted. In its place should be substituted this series of
patches (URLs for 0/3 ... 3/3):
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808422302&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808522316&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808522322&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808622328&w=2
There is likely to be a conflict in applying the 2/3 patch, because its
first hunk touches a region of code also affected by work Rafael has
been doing. The important aspect of that hunk is that it moves the
should_wakeup flag definition outside the region protected by "#ifdef
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP".
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists