[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JbfoM-0003fj-Qz@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:41:18 +0100
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] don't panic if /sbin/init exits or killed
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
>> But panic() isn't better? It doesn't provide any useful info.
>
> It is not misleading in the same way. It's clear that going to look at the
> kernel source is not the place to find the root of the problem.
>
>> Well, I think the generic "if we have a chance to survive, we should try
>> to survive" rule is good.
>>
>> If the boot init dies, at least the admin has a chance to figure out what
>> has happened, and -o remount,ro /.
>
> For me and you, I agree. I think the common case is that there is no admin
> prepared to do any such thing, but just someone expecting a reboot to fix
> things and preferring that a failing system reboot itself in the middle of
> the night rather than wedge.
I think the common case is repairing a system using init=/bin/sh, and
forgetting to not log out instead of fscking the filesystem after the panic.
Rebooting on panic= is fine, but not skipping the umount/sync stages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists