[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080318204646.GY155407@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:46:46 +1100
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: drop_pagecache_sb vs kjournald lockup
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:43:26PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > 2.6.25-rc3, 4p ia64, ext3 root drive.
> >
> > I was running an XFS stress test on one of the XFS partitions on
> > the machine (zero load on the root ext3 drive), when the system
> > locked up in kjournald with this on the console:
> >
> > BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#2, kjournald/2150, a000000100e022e0
> >
> <snip traces>
<snip other stuff>
> > Anyone know the reason why drop_pagecache_sb() uses such a brute-force
> > mechanism to free up clean page cache pages?
> Yes, we know that drop_pagecache_sb() has locking issues but since it
> is intended to be used for debugging purposes only, nobody cared enough
> to fix it. Completely untested patch below if you dare to try ;)
It may be intended for debuging purposes, but it does get used in
production HPC environments (a lot!). I guess I've never seen this
lockup before because SGI customers don't use ext3, but they have
complained about the system "stopping" while drop_caches is executed.
This locking ..... strategy would explain it, though.
I'll try the patch, but I can't guarantee anything - I only saw this
lockup once in about 18 hours when dropping caches every 2 seconds.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists