[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12059476351524-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:25:08 -0300
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...e.de, Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/79] [PATCH] move setup_secondary_clock a little bit down in the function
From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
This is done so we call setup_secondary_clock() in the same place x86_64
does. A separate patch for this is appearantly not needed. But clock
initialization is such a delicate thing, that it's safer to do this way
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c
index 6c16165..4e5416e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c
@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
*/
check_tsc_sync_target();
- setup_secondary_clock();
if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) {
disable_8259A_irq(0);
enable_NMI_through_LVT0();
@@ -214,6 +213,8 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
unlock_ipi_call_lock();
per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE;
+ setup_secondary_clock();
+
wmb();
cpu_idle();
}
--
1.5.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists