[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DDF46CB71CB9D647A983FECACF09A886A8A6B5@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:14:39 -0700
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hidetoshi Seto" <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1][regression] ia64: hackbench doesn't finish >12 hour
>this paramter mean use all physical memory and about 1GB swap space.
>Could you expand swap space?
We can reproduce the soft lockup issue now and root cause the issue as
well.
Since the ptc.g patch uses semaphore ptcg_sem to serialize multiple
ptc.g instructions in ia64_global_tlb_purge(). This requires the code
path should be safe to sleep in down(). But the code path can not sleep
during swap because it holds some spin locks (e.g. anon_vma_lock). Going
to sleep finally causes soft lockup.
Actually we though of this issue before releasing the ptcg patch and
wrote some non-sleeping versions of ptcg patches. But since we couldn't
see the sleeping issue during our testing, we didn't release a
non-sleeping ptcg patch. If replacing the ptcg patch in -mm1 tree with
one of our non-sleeping ptcg patches, the issue goes away.
Tony and I are working on releasing a final ptcg patch to solve the
issue.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists