[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080320102051.dceba604.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:20:51 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, lenb@...nel.org, greg@...ah.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [Build Failure] linux-next: Tree for March 18
Hi Andy,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:31:10 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:
>
> This breakage is shown up when compiled with a config which doesn't have
> CONFIG_PM set. It is a common error to only test with that turned on
> and I am sure that this is just one of a number of bugs that have been
> picked up by real machine configs.
>
> Perhaps it would be worth having one of your integration test runs be
> with a configuration with CONFIG_PM disabled so that they get detected
> earlier in the process.
I have today changed from using powerpc allmodconfig to ppc64_defconfig
which is faster (it was taking over 7-8 hours to create the linux-tree)
and has CONFIG_PM disabled. I am still also doing the x86_64
allmodconfig build.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists