linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1206038135.16475.148.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:35:35 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] introduce ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Kconfig symbol


On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 19:13 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > In many cases, especially in networking, it can be beneficial to
> > know at compile time whether the architecture can do unaligned
> > accesses. This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol
> > 	ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> 
> Can we please have a single symbol defined and name it:
> HAVE_*
> 
> Then the architectures that HAVE this feature can select the symbol.

Sure. Where should it be defined? arch/Kconfig?

> This follows the suggestion as available in
> Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt

Guess I haven't read that in a while.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)