linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Corrections to Documentation/rbtree.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200803201339.18618.rob@landley.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:39:18 -0500
From:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Corrections to Documentation/rbtree.txt

On Thursday 20 March 2008 10:29:57 Ian Abbott wrote:
> From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
>
> The description of the rb_entry() macro in Documentation/rbtree.txt seems
> incorrect. This patch improves it (hopefully).  Also I changed the example
> code to call the previous 'my_search()' example instead of an undefined
> 'mysearch()'.

I have no objection to the patch (and the my_search thing seems like an 
obvious typo), but is there a reason to prefer rb_entry() rather than 
container_of()?  If so, the rationale might be a good thing to add to the 
documentation...

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/