lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E2D8D2.9090407@tmr.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:36:18 -0400
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4]  Modify loop device to be able to manage partitions
   of the disk image

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:24:41 +0100
> Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net> wrote:
> 
>> Le mercredi 19 mars 2008 __ 13:11 -0700, Randy Dunlap a __crit :
>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:36:07 +0100 Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patch allows to use loop device with partitionned disk image.
>>>>
>>>> Original behavior of loop is not modified.
>>>>
>>>> A new parameter is introduced to define how many partition we want to be
>>>> able to manage per loop device. This parameter is "max_part".
>>> What happened to the update to Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> that was in v3?
>> Well, perhaps I didn't understand the comment of Andrew:
>>
>> "This shouldn't be needed."
>>
>> I though it means I should remove it. So, Andrew ???
> 
> No, given that all module_param() options are available via the boot
> command line when the module is linked into vmlinux, we don't document them
> separately.
> 
I totally don't understand this comment, where is the file with the list 
of canonical module parameters now? I must have missed the discussion of 
why it is changed. And what has the boot command line or linking modules 
to do with the documentation file?

> There should be a way of auto-generating all the documentation for all the
> module parameters from their MODULE_PARM_DESC's.  And there probably is,
> but I'm not sure how this is done (?)
> 
> (does `make help', fails to spot it).


-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ