[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Jbwmm-00022R-O8@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:48:48 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] vfs: pnode cleanup
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Move set_mnt_shared from pnode.h to pnode.c. Change
> > CLEAR_MNT_SHARED() to clear_mnt_shared() function, and move to
> > pnode.c.
>
> I don't see why these two are a cleanup, actually.
People don't like my cleanups :( sniff...
> > @@ -89,20 +100,18 @@ static int do_make_slave(struct vfsmount
> > list_for_each_entry(slave_mnt, &mnt->mnt_slave_list, mnt_slave)
> > slave_mnt->mnt_master = master;
> > list_move(&mnt->mnt_slave, &master->mnt_slave_list);
> > - list_splice(&mnt->mnt_slave_list, master->mnt_slave_list.prev);
> > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave_list);
> > + list_splice_init(&mnt->mnt_slave_list,
> > + master->mnt_slave_list.prev);
>
> Umm... OK.
Yeah, not much of an improvement.
> > } else {
> > - struct list_head *p = &mnt->mnt_slave_list;
> > - while (!list_empty(p)) {
> > - slave_mnt = list_first_entry(p,
> > + while (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_slave_list)) {
> > + slave_mnt = list_first_entry(&mnt->mnt_slave_list,
>
> How is that better?
I find it easier to read. Renaming "p" to "slaves" would also have
been better. Single letter variables are reserved for iterators in my
mind...
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists