linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] ptrace: it is fun to strace /sbin/init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080320232503.GG17431@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:25:03 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ptrace: it is fun to strace /sbin/init

On Thu 2008-03-20 19:57:56, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/20, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > > Ptracing of /sbin/init is not allowed. Of course, this is very dangerous, but
> > > may be useful. Introduce the kernel boot parameter to allow this.
> > ...
> > > @@ -803,6 +803,8 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. 
> > >  			Run specified binary instead of /sbin/init as init
> > >  			process.
> > >  
> > > +	init_ptrace	[KNL] Allows to ptrace init. Very dangerous. Don't use.
> > > +
> > 
> > I don't know what ptracing init is good for, and I believe people
> > wanting to do this kind of special stuff can patch their own kernel...
> 
> Yes sure. But could you explain why this can be bad given that ptracing
> init needs the explicit boot parameter? IOW, could you explain why you
> don't like this small and trivial change which adds a minimal impact?

"It can't be bad, its optional".

It is bad exactly _because_ it is optional. Anything that adds boot
parameter is *not* trivial... 

Why not add

please_randomly_corrupt_memory boot parameter? It may be useful for
something...
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
pomozte zachranit klanovicky les:  http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/