[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080320002928.GL1843@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:29:28 -0700
From: akepner@....com
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] dma: dma_{un}map_{single|sg}_attrs() interface
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 08:27:54AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Thanks for looking at this. A new patchset is on the way.
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:41:06 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > +#ifdef ARCH_USES_DMA_ATTRS
> >
> > There is no precedent for ARCH_USES_*.
> >
> > There is a little bit of precedent for ARCH_HAVE_*
> >
> > There is lots of precendence for ARCH_HAS_*.
> >
> > We don't like ARCH_HAS_* anyway ;) What can we do to get rid of this?
> > Ideally, make it available on all architectures at zero cost to those which
> > don't need it. If that is impractical (why?) then it is preferable to do
> > this in Kconfig.
>
> Sam has been pushing HAVE_* and even added that to
> Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt.
OK, changed it to CONFIG_HAVE_DMA_ATTRS.
>
> > > +/*
> > > + * dma_set_attr - set a specific attribute
> > > + * may be called with a null attrs
> > > + */
>
> Use kernel-doc notation?
Done.
--
Arthur
(503) 234 4671
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists