linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86 handle_vm86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:39:46 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 handle_vm86_trap cleanup


* Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:

> Use force_sig in handle_vm86_trap like other machine traps do.

thanks, applied.

> -	if (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) {
> -		unsigned long flags;
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&current->sighand->siglock, flags);
> -		sigdelset(&current->blocked, SIGTRAP);
> -		recalc_sigpending();
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->sighand->siglock, flags);
> -	}
> -	send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 1);
>  	current->thread.trap_no = trapno;
>  	current->thread.error_code = error_code;
> +	force_sig(SIGTRAP, current);
>  	return 0;
>  }

for the record, this also changes semantics, because previously we'd 
permanently unblock SIGTRAP (most certainly as a hack, to be able to do 
the send_sig()), while now we use force_sig() which just ignores the 
blocked mask. (and i agree with your fix of course)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/