lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:31:06 -0400
From:	"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@...izon.net>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@...earch.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc9-git4: pata_pcmcia,
 disabling IRQ #9 and Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:38:31 +0900
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>     
>>> O> Mar 20 19:51:45 idefix kernel: ata12: PATA max PIO0 cmd 0xa100 ctl 
>>>       
>>>> 0xa10e irq 3
>>>> Mar 20 19:52:15 idefix kernel: ata12.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x91)
>>>> Mar 20 19:52:15 idefix kernel: ata12.00: failed to IDENTIFY 
>>>> (INIT_DEV_PARAMS failed, err_mask=0x4)
>>>>         
>>> Thinkpad T61p .. I've seen a few of these.
>>>
>>> Firstly try the card and adapter in a different PC and let me know if
>>> that works. So far they do. If that is the case get the latest firmware
>>> updates (BIOS etc) for your thinkpad and see if the problem goes away.
>>> They (or our ACPI code I guess it may be) have some serious IRQ routing
>>> problems on this box.
>>>       
>> Any chance the thing just chokes up on INIT_DEV_PARAMS?
>>     
>
> Possibly but I've seen several previosu reports showing no IRQ being
> delivered off these machines. You get IRQ 3 reported as assigned and an
> IRQ 9 turns up.
>
> Alan
>
>   

Also, these devices used to work about a year ago (same machine, earlier 
kernel) and then stopped working. 

It is entirely possible that some change triggered a BIOS(?) bug, or 
even that a BIOS upgrade caused the breakage, of course.

I'll try to try out the hardware in another Linux box - it may take a 
while, as I have to find out who at work has liberated their machine 
from corporate IT.  :-)

peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ