[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080321141339.GB9618@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:13:40 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@...l.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:33:24PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Nadia Derbey wrote:
> >Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >>
> >>A microbenchmark on a single-cpu system doesn't help much (except
> >>that 2.6.25 is around factor 2 slower for sysv msg ping-pong between
> >>two tasks compared to the numbers I remember from older kernels....)
> >
> >If I remember well, at that time I had used ctxbench and I wrote some
> >other small scripts.
> >And the results I had were around 2 or 3% slowdown, but I have to
> >confirm that by checking in my archives.
> >
> Do you have access to multi-core systems? The "best case" for the rcu
> code would be
> - 8 or 16 cores
> - one instance of ctxbench running on each core, bound to that core.
>
> I'd expect a significant slowdown. The big question is if it matters.
I could give it a spin -- though I would need to be pointed to the
patch and the test.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists