linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] - Allow NODES_SHIFT to be a config option on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:54:03 -0500
From:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	ak@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Allow NODES_SHIFT to be a config option on x86_64

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:26:49PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Allow the maximum number of nodes in an x86_64 system to be 
> > configurable. This patch does NOT change the default value but allows 
> > the value to be a config option.
> 
> i've applied your patch - but i'm wondering, shouldnt we auto-scale the 
> default according to max number of CPUs? (with some sensible scaling 
> that happens to meet your expected large-system needs as well ;-) All 
> the current manual configuration of nodes shift is ugly.

I would prefer to auto-scale, too, but our hardware platform allows
too many options to make it easy. The current system configs will support
from 0 to 32 cpus per node (some nodes have memory only).

However, I'm open to suggestions if you have any ideas....


--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/