[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E3D0FE.2030508@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:15:10 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>
>>> Hm. I think the problem was that the patch changed the ordering so
>>> that the %ebp fault test was happening with interrupts disabled,
>>> meaning that any fault-in would happen with interrupts disabled.
>>>
>>> Could you tell me if this revised patch still provokes a problem?
>>>
>> it's looking good so far - queued it up.
>>
>
> it just crashed again, crashlog and config attached. This time it didnt
> need an irq flood.
>
Hm. I presume it happens immediately/consistently. Is it something
particular about this .config? Do other configs work for you?
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists