linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:15:10 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>   
>>> Hm.  I think the problem was that the patch changed the ordering so 
>>> that the %ebp fault test was happening with interrupts disabled, 
>>> meaning that any fault-in would happen with interrupts disabled.
>>>
>>> Could you tell me if this revised patch still provokes a problem?
>>>       
>> it's looking good so far - queued it up.
>>     
>
> it just crashed again, crashlog and config attached. This time it didnt 
> need an irq flood.
>   

Hm.  I presume it happens immediately/consistently.  Is it something 
particular about this .config?  Do other configs work for you?

Thanks,
    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/