linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [5/7] Readd rdmsrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803211909501.3781@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:14:41 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:	andreas.herrmann3@....com, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [5/7] Readd rdmsrl_safe

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Well all of paravirt.h uses macros. I did the same for consistency.
> > 
> > consistency ?
> 
> At least I consider it clean and consistent to use similar
> style as the other code in that file for new code I add.

inlines are generally preferred and the existing macro pile is no
excuse to add more.

> > > If you want inlines it would be better to just convert it all in one
> > > go (but please only after this patch was applied)
> > 
> > Of course. We don't want to burden work on your shoulders.
> 
> Well you signed up for the work yourself last year ;-) It was your choice.

Yeah, I signed up for maintaining. And review is one of the tasks of a
maintainer. So when I do a review and ask for a macro -> inline change
I don't see that this means that I have to do the change myself.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/