[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080321190258.GF6571@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:02:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [11/14] vcompound: Fallbacks for order 1 stack allocations on
IA64 and x86
* Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > another thing is that this patchset includes KERNEL_STACK_SIZE_ORDER
> > which has been NACK-ed before on x86 by several people and i'm
> > nacking this "configurable stack size" aspect of it again.
>
> Huh? Nothing of that nature is in this patchset.
your patch indeed does not introduce it here, but
KERNEL_STACK_SIZE_ORDER shows up in the x86 portion of your patch and
you refer to multi-order stack allocations in your 0/14 mail :-)
> -#define alloc_task_struct() ((struct task_struct *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_COMP, KERNEL_STACK_SIZE_ORDER))
> -#define free_task_struct(tsk) free_pages((unsigned long) (tsk), KERNEL_STACK_SIZE_ORDER)
> +#define alloc_task_struct() ((struct task_struct *)__alloc_vcompound( \
> + GFP_KERNEL, KERNEL_STACK_SIZE_ORDER))
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists