linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/13] x86: PAT support updated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:19:22 -0700
From:	Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, ak@....de, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	rdreier@...co.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...e.de,
	airlied@...net.ie, davej@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	jesse.barnes@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] x86: PAT support updated - v3

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 06:29:48AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com wrote:
> >* UC_MINUS in PAT to provide backward compatibility to /dem/mem mmap users.
> 
> I have to say I think this looks like a good patchset.  However, I'd 
> like a bit more clarification with regards to the above point?
> 

X seems to use (in that order)
- mmap the range through /dev/mem
- Set MTRR for the range to WC

I see this happening on one of my test systems with relatively new xorg.

In this case, when mmap does the reserve for this range, if we give UC mapping
then we will effectively negate the MTRR WC setting with the range being mapped
UC. To accomodate this special use case, we give /dev/mem mmap (only when there
are no other already existing mappings) a UC_MINUS attribute. With that,
if and when X sets MTRR the range will become WC and until that time it will be
UC. We ensure that all page table mappings use UC_MINUS for that range.

Long term, we want X to switch to /proc/ of /sys interfaces. But, we can also
provide backward compatibility for existing X usage like above.

Thanks,
Venki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/