[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843ECE1391B@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:04:42 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <npiggin@...e.de>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] Generic smp_call_function(), improvements, and smp_call_function_single()
> The problem may be worse than that. I see that you have a per-cpu
> "call_single_queue" on which you do some list operations.
Simply hacking in an early call to init_call_single_data() helped
a bit. I saw a few more kernel messages as all the cpus were
brought up and synchronized ITC with the boot cpu. Then the
system hung hard. Last messages were:
Total of 16 processors activated (50724.86 BogoMIPS).
net_namespace: 296 bytes
DMI 2.3 present
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists