[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803212215410.3781@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:24:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] infrastructure to debug (dynamic) objects
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > + If you say Y here, additional code will be inserted into the
> > + kernel to track the life time of various objects and validate
>
> lifetime
Fixed.
> > + help
> > + This enables checks whether a k/v free operation frees an area
>
> Please say "kfree/vfree" so that we (I, others) don't have to think
> "what the heck is a k/v free operation?".
Ooops. Missed that one. Fixed it in the docs already.
> > +/*
> > + * We run out of memory. That means we probably have tons of objects
>
> ran
Sigh. This is one of the words which hunt me since school.
> > +/**
> > + * debug_object_init_on_stack - debug checks when an object on stack is
> > + * initialized
>
> Unfortunately the first line of kernel-doc notation ("short description")
> is limited to one line. Even if it exceeds 80 columns. :(
Fixed
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists