[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E4424B.4060802@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:18:35 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@...il.com>, prasanna@...ibm.com,
ananth@...ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Subject: kprobes-x86: correct post-eip value in post_hander()
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> I was trying to get the address of instruction to be executed next
>> after the kprobed instruction. But regs->eip in post_handler()
>> contains value which is useless to the user. It's pre-corrected value.
>> This value is difficult to use without access to resume_execution(),
>> which is not exported anyway. I moved the invocation of post_handler()
>> to *after* resume_execution(). Now regs->eip contains meaningful value
>> in post_handler().
>>
>> I do not think this change breaks any backward-compatibility. To make
>> meaning of the old value, post_handler() would need access to
>> resume_execution() which is not exported. I have difficulty to
>> believe that previous, uncorrected, regs->eip can be meaningfully used
>> in post_handler().
>
> thanks, i've added your patch to the .26 bucket of x86.git, but it would
> be nice to get an Ack/Nack from a kprobes person as well.
>
> Ingo
Ingo, I also tested this on x86-64/x86/ia64.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Thanks,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists