[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080321.003123.180348056.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: clameter@....com
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [14/14] vcompound: Avoid vmalloc for ehash_locks
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > But, isnt it defeating the purpose of this *particular* vmalloc() use ?
>
> I thought that was controlled by hashdist? I did not see it used here and
> so I assumed that the RR was not intended here.
It's intended for all of the major networking hash tables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists