| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080322142915.GA9478@in.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:59:15 +0530
From: Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>
To: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RT] [PATCH] Make scheduler root_domain modular (sched_class
specific)
Hello,
Thanks Gregory for clarifying my question on root_domains infrastructure. What
I was effectively mentioning on irc the other day was to make the root_domain
infrastructure modular, ie sched_class specific. Currently, only rt is making
use of this infrasture. Making it modular would enable ease of extension to
other sched_classes if required. Trivial patch to that effect.
Patch compile and boot tested.
Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>
Index: linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24.3-rt3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2008-03-21 22:57:04.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched.c 2008-03-21 23:04:56.000000000 +0530
@@ -337,11 +337,8 @@
* object.
*
*/
-struct root_domain {
- atomic_t refcount;
- cpumask_t span;
- cpumask_t online;
+struct rt_root_domain {
/*
* The "RT overload" flag: it gets set if a CPU has more than
* one runnable RT task.
@@ -353,6 +350,14 @@
#endif
};
+struct root_domain {
+ atomic_t refcount;
+ cpumask_t span;
+ cpumask_t online;
+
+ struct rt_root_domain rt_dom;
+};
+
/*
* By default the system creates a single root-domain with all cpus as
* members (mimicking the global state we have today).
@@ -6332,7 +6337,7 @@
cpus_clear(rd->span);
cpus_clear(rd->online);
- cpupri_init(&rd->cpupri);
+ cpupri_init(&rd->rt_dom.cpupri);
}
Index: linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24.3-rt3.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c 2008-03-21 22:57:04.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched_rt.c 2008-03-21 23:04:39.000000000 +0530
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
static inline int rt_overloaded(struct rq *rq)
{
- return atomic_read(&rq->rd->rto_count);
+ return atomic_read(&rq->rd->rt_dom.rto_count);
}
static inline void rt_set_overload(struct rq *rq)
{
- cpu_set(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
+ cpu_set(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rt_dom.rto_mask);
/*
* Make sure the mask is visible before we set
* the overload count. That is checked to determine
@@ -21,14 +21,14 @@
* updated yet.
*/
wmb();
- atomic_inc(&rq->rd->rto_count);
+ atomic_inc(&rq->rd->rt_dom.rto_count);
}
static inline void rt_clear_overload(struct rq *rq)
{
/* the order here really doesn't matter */
- atomic_dec(&rq->rd->rto_count);
- cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
+ atomic_dec(&rq->rd->rt_dom.rto_count);
+ cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rt_dom.rto_mask);
}
static void update_rt_migration(struct rq *rq)
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->prio < rq->rt.highest_prio) {
rq->rt.highest_prio = p->prio;
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, p->prio);
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt_dom.cpupri, rq->cpu, p->prio);
}
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rq->rt.rt_nr_migratory++;
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
}
if (rq->rt.highest_prio != highest_prio)
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt_dom.cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
update_rt_migration(rq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
{
int count;
- count = cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, task, lowest_mask);
+ count = cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->rt_dom.cpupri, task, lowest_mask);
/*
* cpupri cannot efficiently tell us how many bits are set, so it only
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@
next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq);
- for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) {
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, this_rq->rd->rt_dom.rto_mask) {
if (this_cpu == cpu)
continue;
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@
if (rq->rt.overloaded)
rt_set_overload(rq);
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt_dom.cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
}
/* Assumes rq->lock is held */
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@
if (rq->rt.overloaded)
rt_clear_overload(rq);
- cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, CPUPRI_INVALID);
+ cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt_dom.cpupri, rq->cpu, CPUPRI_INVALID);
}
/*
--
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@...ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs,
Bangalore, India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists