linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 2/3 mtd: add support for flash on the SEGA Dreamcast Visual Memory Unit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1206211147.6324.48.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:39:07 +0000
From:	Adrian McMenamin <adrian@...golddream.dyndns.info>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc:	dwmw2 <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	linux-sh <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	MTD <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2/3 mtd: add support for flash on the SEGA Dreamcast
	Visual Memory Unit


On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 19:32 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sat, 22 March 2008 18:03:55 +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > 

> Without a doubt, buffering is useful.  However I question how useful it
> is to implement this in individual device drivers instead of once in
> mtd_core.c.


Well, it's obviously useful to this device. Are you making best the
enemy of better?


> 
> Given that you have ignored most of my previous comments, NAK. 


Not good enough, frankly. What comments have I ignored? I didn't
implement your suggestion that a void* memory type become be32* because
it was totally inappropriate for a type that is passed in both be32 and
le32 and as u8.


>  I don't
> mind merging code that isn't up to our standards yet.  But I have a bad
> feeling about a maintainer that does not understand review comments.
> Since you had similar problems understanding Andrew, part of the blame
> may sit on your side.
> 

I'm sorry that you feel that way, but as you took the hump when I said
that this:

"Possibly the big-endian annotations need to trickly though the layers
here as well."

Isn't good english (and it's not) and asked you - twice - to explain
what you meant. I cannot accept your summary.


Adrian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/