lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803221225.26728.bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
Date:	Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:25:26 +0100
From:	Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@....de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: deadline unfairness

Hello,

some it seems the deadline scheduler is rather unfair. Below is an example
of md-raid6 initialization of md3, md4 and md5. All three md-devices
do share the same blockdevices (we have patched md to allow
parallel rebuild of shared block devices, since for us the cpu is the 
bottleneck and not the block device).

All rebuilds started basically at the same time, as you can see, md3 is already
done and now md4 rebuilds substantially faster than md5.


md5 : active raid6 sdk3[0] sde3[5] sdi3[4] sdm3[3] sdc3[2] sdg3[1]
      6834869248 blocks level 6, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      [=============>.......]  resync = 65.8% (1124909328/1708717312) finish=272.2min speed=35734K/sec

md4 : active raid6 sdk2[0] sde2[5] sdi2[4] sdm2[3] sdc2[2] sdg2[1]
      6834869248 blocks level 6, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      [===============>.....]  resync = 77.6% (1327362312/1708717312) finish=123.9min speed=51283K/sec

md3 : active raid6 sdk1[0] sde1[5] sdi1[4] sdm1[3] sdc1[2] sdg1[1]
      6834869248 blocks level 6, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]


Reducing write_expire to 2000ms did improve the situation a bit, but noop and 
the other schedulers are still by far more fair.

Here with noop:

md5 : active raid6 sdk3[0] sde3[5] sdi3[4] sdm3[3] sdc3[2] sdg3[1]
      6834869248 blocks level 6, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      [=============>.......]  resync = 67.3% (1150741776/1708717312) finish=216.8min speed=42875K/sec

md4 : active raid6 sdk2[0] sde2[5] sdi2[4] sdm2[3] sdc2[2] sdg2[1]
      6834869248 blocks level 6, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      [===============>.....]  resync = 79.3% (1355377160/1708717312) finish=134.8min speed=43659K/sec

md3 : active raid6 sdk1[0] sde1[5] sdi1[4] sdm1[3] sdc1[2] sdg1[1]
      6834869248 blocks level 6, 256k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]


This is basically with a 2.6.22 kernel + lustre + md-backports, but nothing
done to the scheduler.


Cheers,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ