[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1206270968.6437.97.camel@lappy>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:16:08 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 120/148] include/asm-x86/suspend_32.h: checkpatch
cleanups - formatting only
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 11:57 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 01:03:35AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > --- a/include/asm-x86/suspend_32.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-x86/suspend_32.h
> > @@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ extern unsigned long saved_edi;
> > static inline void acpi_save_register_state(unsigned long return_point)
> > {
> > saved_eip = return_point;
> > - asm volatile ("movl %%esp,%0" : "=m" (saved_esp));
> > - asm volatile ("movl %%ebp,%0" : "=m" (saved_ebp));
> > - asm volatile ("movl %%ebx,%0" : "=m" (saved_ebx));
> > - asm volatile ("movl %%edi,%0" : "=m" (saved_edi));
> > - asm volatile ("movl %%esi,%0" : "=m" (saved_esi));
> > + asm volatile("movl %%esp,%0" : "=m" (saved_esp));
> > + asm volatile("movl %%ebp,%0" : "=m" (saved_ebp));
> > + asm volatile("movl %%ebx,%0" : "=m" (saved_ebx));
> > + asm volatile("movl %%edi,%0" : "=m" (saved_edi));
> > + asm volatile("movl %%esi,%0" : "=m" (saved_esi));
>
> Since when "volatile" became a function?
Agreed, this is crack.
Joe, please find something useful to contribute. Having a few cleanup
patches at the beginning of a useful series isn't an issue, but such
series as posted here are utterly annoying, and by the above just plain
stupid.
checkpatch.pl is a guide, not a replacement for common sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists