[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080323171652.GF10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:16:52 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:24:03AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >Hmm interesting, so someone took the VGA thing and made a storage device
> >for it. Did that ever happen with AGP? Any AGP scsi cards. I guess I can
> >Google for it.
>
> A lot less likely, IMO. Unlike AGP-PCI, VLB slots were compatible with
> ISA cards, and the electricals were less complex, so several motherboard
> manufacturers built boards with 3 or more VESA slots (I think I saw a
> board with 6 at one point.)
>
> AGP electricals pretty much require that it be point to point.
... not that VLB didn't suck badly with several devices attached at the same
time. I would be rather surprised if that board would work if fully populated
with VLB cards, all in active use. IOW, a likely explanation is that it
had a warning along the lines of "use of more than <number> of VLB cards
at the same time may use instability" buried in documentation and proud
"6 VLB slots!!!" touted by marketing...
I can't find VLB specs online, but IIRC 3 had been the limit and anything
past that had been very much out of spec and likely to screw you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists