linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c: time_before(timeout, jiffies) -> jiffies, timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1206373941.4845.21.camel@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:52:21 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c: time_before(timeout, jiffies)
	-> jiffies, timeout

On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 16:01 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> > Wouldn't it be better to have a schedule() in those
> > while loops too?
> There is a schedule() here:

What's the value of not having schedule() in the
wanxl_open and wanxl_close routines?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/