linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel: add byteorder macros with alignment fixups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1206376543.9265.5.camel@brick>
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:35:43 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kernel: add byteorder macros with alignment fixups

On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 14:59 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2008-03-20 12:22:33, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +
> > +static inline u64 le64_to_cpu_unaligned(void *p)
> > +{
> > +	return __le64_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le64 *)p));
> > +}
> 
> Why the cast? Should le64_to_cpu() take __le64 * parameter, so that normal
> typechecking still works?
> 							Pavel

Well, most places that would use this have a char *, or a u8 * so I was
avoiding a cast in most callers.

HPA made a good suggestion about this being in asm-generic allowing
arches to optimize this, so I'm reworking with that approach.

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/