[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cefeab80803241034m6f62c01fq669129db9959f47f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:04:18 +0530
From: "Nitin Gupta" <nitingupta910@...il.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] compcache: TLSF Allocator interface
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 20:34 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > Two Level Segregate Fit (TLSF) Allocator is used to allocate memory for
> > variable size compressed pages. Its fast and gives low fragmentation.
> > Following links give details on this allocator:
> > - http://rtportal.upv.es/rtmalloc/files/tlsf_paper_spe_2007.pdf
> > - http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/TLSFAllocator
> >
> > This kernel port of TLSF (v2.3.2) introduces several changes but underlying
> > algorithm remains the same.
> >
> > Changelog TLSF v2.3.2 vs this kernel port
> > - Pool now dynamically expands/shrinks.
> > It is collection of contiguous memory regions.
> > - Changes to pool create interface as a result of above change.
> > - Collect and export stats (/proc/tlsfinfo)
> > - Cleanups: kernel coding style, added comments, macros -> static inline, etc.
>
> Can you explain why you need this allocator, why don't the current
> kernel allocators work for you?
>
>
kmalloc() allocates one of pre-defined sizes (as defined in
kmalloc_sizes.h). This will surely cause severe fragmentation with
these variable sized compressed pages.
Whereas, TLSF maintains very fine grained size lists. In all the
workloads I tested, it showed <5% fragmentation. Also, its very simple
as just ~700 LOC.
- Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists