[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080324.144629.137399000.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: clameter@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: larger default page sizes...
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:25:11 -0700
> When memory capacity is measured in hundreds of GB, then
> a larger page size doesn't look so ridiculous.
We have hugepages and such for a reason. And this can be
made more dynamic and flexible, as needed.
Increasing the page size is a "stick your head in the sand"
type solution by my book.
Especially when you can make the hugepage facility stronger
and thus get what you want without the memory wastage side
effects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists