[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080324093436.GH10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:34:36 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] vfs: mountinfo stable peer group id
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:19:41AM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> > * in do_change_type(), outside of vfsmount_lock, do invent_group_ids()
> > If it fails - bugger off, if not - proceed as now.
>
> Has it to be done outside vfsmount_lock? AFAICT, invent_group_ids()
> does not sleep, nor does change_mnt_propagation().
It does allocation. And no, GFP_ATOMIC is not appropriate for that.
The same goes for mount IDs, BTW, and there we _also_ don't need
vfsmount_lock - see my current tree, there we have clone_mnt()
serialized by namespace_sem in all cases.
> > * in attach_recursive_mnt() if IS_MNT_SHARED(dest_mnt) do
> > invent_group_ids() on the dest_mnt immediately and if it fails do
>
> I think you meant, invent_group_ids() on the source_mnt.
Yes
> But again
> applying invent_group_ids() on the source_mnt has to be done carefully,
> because, source_mnt may have been shared to begin with.
And? See the original posting - invent_group_ids() skips the vfsmounts
with already set group ID.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists