[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3k5js2nfl.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:42:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c: time_before(timeout, jiffies) -> jiffies, timeout
Hi,
Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl> writes:
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c
> @@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ static int __devinit wanxl_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> timeout = jiffies + 20 * HZ;
> while ((stat = readl(card->plx + PLX_MAILBOX_0)) != 0) {
> - if (time_before(timeout, jiffies)) {
> + if (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "wanXL %s: timeout waiting for"
> " PUTS to complete\n", pci_name(pdev));
> wanxl_pci_remove_one(pdev);
>
I can't see a bug here - time_before(timeout, jiffies) means "if
timeout is before jiffies", IOW if jiffies passed the timeout.
Perhaps time_after(jiffies, timeout) is a bit better equivalent, I
will use that.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists