[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080325.024204.175042056.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: jirislaby@...il.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, joe@...ches.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups
- formatting only
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:44:57 +0100
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> > I strongly disagree still.
> >
> > Half the warnings I get when I have run checkpatch on things I've
> > written were crap.
>
> could you please give me a file name as an example that i could
> double-check myself? Thanks,
I can't because I pacified it to cut down the review noise
for the patch in question last time it happened.
I can tell you one more example of things I strongly disagree with
that it does, for example, such as telling me how to document
spinlocks in datastructures.
It wants a comment right above the spinlock_t member, but this
totally ignores that perhaps I put a huge comment explaining
the locking semantics elsewhere.
It's a black and white tool in a grey world, it just sucks. And I'd
be fine with that if people used it as a guide but people, especially
kernel newbies, treat it as gospel and a way to contribe "useful"
patches. They aren't useful, they're crap. Fix a bug instead of this
automaton whitespace noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists