lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080325140825.GA19722@bit.office.eurotux.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:08:25 +0000
From:	Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com>
To:	Michael Meyer <mike65134@...oo.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 >
	/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> what is the difference between booting a dual core
> machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the second
> core at run time with "echo 0 >
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?

maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and switch to UP only,
optimising some locks and instructions.

-- 
Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com>
Eurotux Informática, S.A. <http://www.eurotux.com/>

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ