[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803251524.34147.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:24:33 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 2)
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 15:19:45 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 14:06:15 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > On Tuesday, 25 of March 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > > A device that cannot wake up is unusable. Shouldn't the pm core disconnect()
> > > > such a device?
>
> It's not safe for the PM core to do such things unilaterally. The
> decision to unregister a device should be made by the driver or the
> subsystem.
Why? You can trigger it from user space via sysfs and in many cases
suspending to disk will disconnect all devices on a bus, so I'd say a
failure to resume is just a limited subcase of a device vanishing during
sleep.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists