[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3y786c0k0.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:58:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
xemul@...nvz.org, pavel@....cz, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
roland@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: it is fun to strace /sbin/init
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> writes:
> Sure, but if the deadlocks can be avoided on the kernel level (just
> making sure the children are already reaped) then it would be even
> better.
Well, if you mean the kernel would do that unconditionally (thus it
won't be init's job anymore, ptrace or not) then I can only agree.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists