linux-kernel - Re: What to do about the 2TB limit on HDIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:17:58 -0700
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What to do about the 2TB limit on HDIO_GETGEO ?

On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 00:02 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> (resending .. forgot to copy the lists originally)
> 
> We have a problem coming down the pipeline.
> 
> Practically all utilities that care about it,
> use ioctl(fd, HDIO_GETGEO) to determine the starting
> sector offset of a hard disk partition.
> 
> SCSI, libata, IDE, USB, Firewire.. you name it.
> 
> The return value uses "unsigned long",
> which on a 32-bit system limits drive offsets to 2TB.
> 
> There will be single drives exceeding this limit within
> the next 12 months or less, and we already have RAID arrays
> that exceed 2TB.
> 
> So.. what's the replacement for HDIO_GETGEO on 32-bits ?
> 
> One candidate might seem to be the existing /sys/block/dev/partition/start
> which I expect is already 64-bit friendly.
> 
> But this requires about 150 lines of somewhat complex C code to access,
> using only the dev_t (from stat(2) on a file) as a starting point,
> or less if one relies upon the udev device name matching the sysfs device name.
> 
> Is it time now for HDIO_GETGEO64 to make an appearance?
> Similar to how the existing BLKGETSIZE64 is supplanting BLKGETSIZE ?

Perhaps I've missed something, but surely geometry doesn't make sense on
a >2TB drive does it?  The only reason we use it on modern disks (which
usually make it up specially for us) is that the DOS partition scheme
requires it.  Once we're over 2TB, isn't it impossible to use DOS
partitions (well, OK, unless you increase the sector size, but that's
only delaying the inevitable), so we can just go with a proper disk
labelling scheme and use BLKGETSIZE64 all the time.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/