[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080325165404.GS2170@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:54:04 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, andreas.herrmann3@....com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [6/7] Split large page mapping for AMD TSEG
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:44:21PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +
> > + if (!direct_gbpages &&
> > + c == &boot_cpu_data && c->x86 >= 0xf && c->x86 <= 0x11) {
> > + unsigned long tseg;
>
> Can we do this at some place which is only called once ?
Nothing obvious. We could add it, but then would need to add a (imho ugly)
vendor check there first.
I think it is better to have the cpu specific code all in one place.
>
> > + /*
> > + * Split up direct mapping around the TSEG SMM area.
> > + * Don't do it for gbpages because there seems very little
> > + * benefit in doing so.
> > + */
> > + if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_K8_TSEG_ADDR, &tseg) &&
>
> warning: passing argument 2 of 'rdmsrl_safe' from incompatible pointer type
Yes the type has to be updated after the earlier inline change.
Easiest you just do the trivial change yourself.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists