[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57127.43039.qm@web25812.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:23:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Meyer <mike65134@...oo.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
--- Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> schrieb:
> Luciano Rocha <luciano@...otux.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael
> Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the difference between booting a dual
> core
> > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the
> second
> > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> >
> > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and
> switch to UP only,
> > optimising some locks and instructions.
>
> CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely
> it accounts
> for that much performance difference.
>
> If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0
> disables
> the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference.
> But it should
> be actually slower.
>
> There should be actually no difference in theory
> between max_cpus=1
> and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.
I had the following time values:
maxcpus=1:
real 0m1.642s
user 0m1.528s
sys 0m0.068s
maxcpus=2 and
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
real 0m2.579s
user 0m4.096s
sys 0m0.160s
maxcpus=2 and
echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
real 0m3.757s
user 0m3.632s
sys 0m0.112s
Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails jetzt einfach von unterwegs.
www.yahoo.de/go
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists