[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E9383F.3050908@rtr.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:37:03 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What to do about the 2TB limit on HDIO_GETGEO ?
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that would be just as good, really. Maybe even better.
>>
>> Mark Lord wrote (later on):
>>> Instead, software has to search everything inside /sys/block/
>>> looking for a "dev" file whose contents match,
>>> rather than just trying to access something like this:
>>>
>>> /sys/block/8:1/start
>>> or
>>> /sys/block/majors/8/minors/1/start
>>>
>>> Or any one of a number of similar ways to arrange it.
>> ..
>
> It shouldn't be under /sys/block... there are enough many things that
> scan /sys/block and assume any directory underneath it has the current
> format.
..
So long as we only add things, and not remove them, then any software
that scans /sys/block/ shouldn't care, really.
But yes, it could go elsewhere, too.
Perhaps a /sys/dev/ directory, populated with symbolic links
(or hard links?) back to the /sys/block/ entries, something like this:
/sys/dev/block/8:0 -> ../../../block/sda
/sys/dev/block/8:1 -> ../../../block/sda/sda1
/sys/dev/block/8:2 -> ../../../block/sda/sda2
...
That's just a suggestion, really.
And what about character devices?
Perhaps Greg will chime in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists