[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080325180004.GE15355@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:00:06 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de, paulus@...ba.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Generic smp_call_function(), improvements, and smp_call_function_single()
On Tue, Mar 25 2008, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > So now I/we just need to figure out why the hack to call
> > init_call_single_data() is needed. You seem to imply it was being called
> > too late, I thought perhaps too early. Where did you stick the
> > init_call_single_data() call in?
>
> In ia64 the first calls to smp_call_function_single() are made
> while bringing up other cpus ... which happens from:
>
> kernel_init()
> smp_init()
>
> The init calls are made a few lines later (still in kernel_init):
>
> do_basic_setup()
> do_initcalls()
>
> I moved the call radically earlier (before sched_init() in
> init/main.c:start_kernel()) just to be sure, but that was
> overkill.
>
> Perhaps making the call from do_pre_smp_initcalls() is the
> logical place? Like this (though purists will say that the
> extern declaration should be in some header file):
It looks fine to me, not a big deal I think... I was woried that
core_initcall() would not suit all, so this helps.
Thanks Tony!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists