[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803252048.43792.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:48:42 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 2)
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 15:33:22 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > so I'd say a
> > failure to resume is just a limited subcase of a device vanishing during
> > sleep.
>
> I'll go along with that. If a device vanishes during sleep, the PM
> core isn't responsible for unregistering it -- the device's subsystem
> is.
Yes, that makes sense. You are right.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists