linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 019/148] include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h: checkpatch cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:15:10 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 019/148] include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h: checkpatch
	cleanups - formatting only

* Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 16:30 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > +#define X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD     _CF(3, 16) /* rep microcode works well
> > > +					     * on this CPU */
> > that is crap too ...
> 
> the _CF or the newly line-broken comment?

both :) Line-breaking in macros isnt done like that. And the _CF thing:

 +#if defined _CF
 +#undef _CF
 +#endif
 +#define _CF(word, bit) ((word) * 32 + (bit))

looks quite ugly - either we have such a macro in which case it should 
be a generic define somewhere that doesnt override anything else, or we 
shouldnt do it.

I also had to fix some other typos that broke the 64-bit build. I ended 
up skipping the whole cpufeatures.h patch - could you please re-do and 
re-send it?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/