[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843ECE9E1AB@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:49:46 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Dean Nelson" <dcn@....com>, <jes@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:25:24PM -0500, dcn@....com wrote:
> This set of five patches moves XPC and XPNET to drivers/misc/xp in preparation
> for enabling X86_64 support.
Part 2 (which I got since you addressed it to me directly as well as
to the list) has a couple of "Space in indent is follwed by a tab"
complaints from GIT. Part 3 has one too. Apart from that all five
parts apply and the build is clean on all my configs. Boots on the
tiger (but this doesn't constitute a review ... just a "you didn't
break anything unrelated while making this change").
> The missing patch moved XPC and XPNET from arch/ia64/sn to drivers/misc/xp.
> How should such a patch be submitted?
I think git has an option to produce its own brand of diff output
that lists the renames without doing a full remove & add which is
needed for patch(1) comprehensibility. A few minutes staring at
git documentation hasn't revealed what that option is though :-(
For purposes of getting someone to review ... you could hand edit
to show the renames as:
$ mv arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_channel.c drivers/misc/xp/xpc_channel.c
... etc.
and just include the diffs for the Makefiles, Kconfig etc.
Or break part 2 into:
2a - remove driver from arch/ia64
2b - add driver to drivers/misc/xp
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists