linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080325.160916.182495221.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	jirislaby@...il.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, joe@...ches.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 109/148] include/asm-x86/serial.h: checkpatch cleanups
 - formatting only

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:17:08 +0100

> There can be fluctuations and artifacts, and obviously this is just 
> another (arbitrary) static metric that has no forced relationship with 
> real code quality - but in my experience it's surprisingly close to 
> reality - closer than any other code metric i've seen.

And yet you used it to claim that the sparc64 port is an
unmaintainable pile of poo.

Thanks but no thanks, you just proved even more to me why
checkpatch is crap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/